How Did the Windsors Become the Royal Family?

By Rob

The House of Windsor became the British Royal Family in 1917. Before this, they were known as the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. King George V changed the family name due to anti-German sentiment during World War I.

A majestic castle stands against a backdrop of rolling hills and a serene river, symbolizing the establishment of the Windsors as the royal family

This change was part of a broader strategy to strengthen British identity and patriotism during a turbulent period. Adopting the name Windsor, after the castle, underscored their connection to British heritage.

The rebranding solidified their place in the nation’s heart. It marked a pivotal moment, ensuring the monarchy remained relevant in a rapidly changing world.

The Windsor Dynasty’s Origin

The Windsors, originally known as the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, changed their name during World War I due to anti-German sentiment. This strategic move helped solidify their place as the British Royal Family.

From Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor

The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha originated from Prince Albert, who married Queen Victoria in 1840. Their descendants ruled varying European territories. In 1917, during World War I, there was significant anti-German sentiment in Britain.

King George V, understanding the importance of public perception, decided to change the family name. Inspired by Windsor Castle, he renamed the dynasty to the House of Windsor. This change was a move to align the monarchy more closely with British nationalism and to distance the royal family from its German roots.

The Impact of World War I

World War I played a crucial role in transforming the British monarchy’s identity. The war intensified nationalist feelings, making the German affiliation of the royal family problematic. King George V’s decision to rebrand the family was a strategic response to public opinion.

The name change helped mitigate the negative views associated with their German heritage. Consequently, the Windsors strengthened their image as a British institution, fostering greater national unity and support during turbulent times. This move was pivotal in ensuring the monarchy’s continuity and relevance in the 20th century.

Influential Monarchs of the House of Windsor

The House of Windsor has been shaped by monarchs who consolidated power, reigned with longevity, and adapted to modern expectations.

King George V’s Consolidation of Power

King George V steered the monarchy through turbulent times, including World War I. He rebranded the royal family, changing its name from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the House of Windsor in 1917 to distance it from German ties. His leadership helped stabilise the monarchy during the war, earning public support and strengthening national identity.

He played a crucial role in expanding the Commonwealth and was instrumental in maintaining relations with other nations. George V’s tact in political matters reinforced the monarchy’s relevance in a changing world.

Queen Elizabeth II’s Long Reign

Queen Elizabeth II became one of the most enduring figures in British history. Her reign, beginning in 1952, witnessed significant social, political, and technological changes. Her ability to adapt while maintaining the dignity of the crown ensured the monarchy’s survival and relevance.

Elizabeth II maintained a hectic schedule of public appearances and diplomatic duties. She used her influence to foster unity within the Commonwealth, expanding it to 54 nations. Her emphasis on public service set a standard for future monarchs.

Modernisation and Public Perception

The House of Windsor underwent significant modernisation to stay in touch with public sentiment. Public ceremonies became more inclusive, reflecting broader societal changes. The monarchy embraced modern technology, notably television, to reach a wider audience.

The family dealt with scandals and personal issues publicly, transforming public perception. The investments in charity and increased transparency bolstered their standing with the population. Their engagement with social issues and charities showcased a more progressive and approachable image.

About the author
Rob